Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight? Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight? - Pagina 2

Pagina 2 di 2 PrimaPrima 12
Risultati da 21 a 27 di 27

Discussione: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

  1. #21
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ L'avatar di ZTL
    Data Registrazione
    Jul 2017
    Località
    Roma
    Messaggi
    26.935
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: alberace

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    Cerca l'autore su Amazon
    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da Sinex/ Visualizza Messaggio
    ti stai già sborrando in mano e ti prepari con gli esercizi di apnea per uralre "VE L'AVEVO DETTOOOOO HAHAHAHAAH" mentre l'onda d'urto ti strappa le carni dalle ossa?

  2. #22
    Zerò
    Data Registrazione
    Aug 2017
    Località
    San Diego
    Messaggi
    3.522

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    Da Blindsight, romanzo che l'autore ha pubblicato su Internet, accesso gratuito.


    A Brief Primer on Vampire Biology
    I'm hardly the first author to take a stab at rationalising vampirism in purely biological terms. Richard Matheson did it before I was born, and if the grapevine's right that damn Butler woman's latest novel will be all over the same territory before you even read this. I bet I'm the first to come up with the Crucifix Glitch to explain the aversion to crosses, though— and once struck by that bit of inspiration, everything else followed.
    Vampires were accidentally rediscovered when a form of experimental gene therapy went curiously awry, kick-starting longdormant genes in an autistic child and provoking a series of (ultimately fatal) physical and neurological changes. The company responsible for this discovery presented its findings after extensive follow-up studies on inmates of the Texas penal system; a recording of that talk, complete with visual aids, is available online 1 ; curious readers with half an hour to kill are refered there for details not only on vampire biology, but on the research, funding, and "ethical and political concerns" regarding vampire domestication (not to mention the ill-fated "Taming Yesterday's Nightmares For A Brighter Tomorrow" campaign). The following (much briefer) synopsis restricts itself to a few biological characteristics of the ancestral organism:
    Homo sapiens vampiris was a short-lived Human subspecies which diverged from the ancestral line between 800,000 and 500,000 year BP. More gracile than either neandertal or sapiens, gross physical divergence from sapiens included slight elongation of canines, mandibles, and long bones in service of an increasingly predatory lifestyle. Due to the relatively brief lifespan of this lineage, these changes were not extensive and overlapped considerably with conspecific allometries; differences become diagnostically significant only at large sample sizes (N>130).
    However, while virtually identical to modern humans in terms of gross physical morphology, vampiris was radically divergent from sapiens on the biochemical, neurological, and soft-tissue levels.
    The GI tract was foreshortened and secreted a distinct range of enzymes more suited to a carnivorous diet. Since cannibalism carries with it a high risk of prionic infection 2 , the vampire immune system displayed great resistance to prion diseases 3 , as well as to a variety of helminth and anasakid parasites. Vampiris hearing and vision were superior to that of sapiens; vampire retinas were quadrochromatic (containing four types of cones, compared to only three among baseline humans); the fourth cone type, common to nocturnal predators ranging from cats to snakes, was tuned to nearinfrared. Vampire grey matter was "underconnected" compared to Human norms due to a relative lack of interstitial white matter; this forced isolated cortical modules to become self-contained and hypereffective, leading to omnisavantic pattern-matching and analytical skills 4 .
    Virtually all of these adaptations are cascade effects that— while resulting from a variety of proximate causes— can ultimately be traced back to a paracentric inversion mutation on the Xq21.3
    block of the X-chromosome 5 . This resulted in functional changes to genes coding for protocadherins (proteins that play a critical role in brain and central nervous system development). While this provoked radical neurological and behavioral changes, significant physical changes were limited to soft tissue and microstructures that do not fossilise. This, coupled with extremely low numbers of vampire even at peak population levels (existing as they did at the tip of the trophic pyramid) explains their virtual absence from the fossil record.
    Significant deleterious effects also resulted from this cascade.
    For example, vampires lost the ability to code for ε-Protocadherin Y, whose genes are found exclusively on the hominid Y chromosome 6 . Unable to synthesise this vital protein themselves, vampires had to obtain it from their food. Human prey thus comprised an essential component of their diet, but a relatively slow-breeding one (a unique situation, since prey usually outproduce their predators by at least an order of magnitude).
    Normally this dynamic would be utterly unsustainable: vampires would predate humans to extinction, and then die off themselves for lack of essential nutrients.
    Extended periods of lungfish-like dormancy 7 (the so-called "undead" state)—and the consequent drastic reduction in vampire energetic needs— developed as a means of redressing this imbalance. To this end vampires produced elevated levels of endogenous Ala-(D) Leuenkephalin (a mammalian hibernationinducing peptide 8 ) and dobutamine, which strengthens the heart muscle during periods on inactivity 9 .
    Another deleterious cascade effect was the so-called "Crucifix Glitch"— a cross-wiring of normally-distinct receptor arrays in the visual cortex 10 , resulting in grand mal-like feedback siezures whenever the arrays processing vertical and horizontal stimuli fired simultaneously across a sufficiently large arc of the visual field.
    Since intersecting right angles are virtually nonexistent in nature, natural selection did not weed out the Glitch until H. sapiens sapiens developed Euclidean architecture; by then, the trait had become fixed across H. sapiens vampiris via genetic drift, and— suddenly denied access to its prey—the entire subspecies went extinct shortly after the dawn of recorded history.
    You'll have noticed that Jukka Sarasti, like all reconstructed vampires, sometimes clicked to himself when thinking. This is thought to hail from an ancestral language, which was hardwired into a click-speech mode more than 50,000 years BP. Click-based speech is especially suited to predators stalking prey on savannah grasslands (the clicks mimic the rustling of grasses, allowing communication without spooking quarry) 11 . The Human language most closely akin to Old Vampire is Hadzane 12 .
    Sleight of Mind
    The Human sensorium is remarkably easy to hack; our visual system has been described as an improvised "bag of tricks" 13 at best. Our sense organs acquire such fragmentary, imperfect input that the brain has to interpret their data using rules of probability rather than direct perception 14 . It doesn't so much see the world as make an educated guess about it. As a result, "improbable" stimuli tends to go unprocessed at the conscious level, no matter how strong the input. We tend to simply ignore sights and sound that don't fit with our worldview.
    Sarasti was right: Rorschach wouldn't do anything to you that you don't already do to yourself.
    For example, the invisibility trick of that young, dumb scrambler — the one who restricted its movement to the gaps in Human vision— occured to me while reading about something called inattentional blindness. A Russian guy called Yarbus was the first to figure out the whole saccadal glitch in Human vision, back in the nineteen sixties 15 . Since then, a variety of researchers have made objects pop in and out of the visual field unnoticed, conducted conversations with hapless subjects who never realised that their conversational partner had changed halfway through the interview, and generally proven that the Human brain just fails to notice an awful lot of what's going on around it 16, 17, 18 . Check out the demos at the website of the Visual Cognition Lab at the University of Illinois 19 and you'll see what I mean. This really is rather mind-blowing, people. There could be Scientologists walking among us right now and if they moved just right, we'd
    never even see them.

  3. #23
    macs
    Guest

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    Un po' pesante, sembra quasi di essere su pubmed

  4. #24
    Zerò
    Data Registrazione
    Aug 2017
    Località
    San Diego
    Messaggi
    3.522

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    Quella è un'appendice per chi avesse curiosità di approfondire l'origine del vampiro del romanzo, quindi è di fatto una trattazione scientifica del soggetto ed è normale sia così densa. In generale è più scorrevole, rimanendo però ostico a tratti. La hard science fiction non è per tutti.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Data Registrazione
    Jan 2016
    Messaggi
    5.368

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da Lo Zio Visualizza Messaggio
    ma le quote rosa sono rispettate? o è la solita roba per white trash omofoba razzista (e facista)?
    urge il test di Bechdel

    https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_di_Bechdel

  6. #26
    Bannato
    Data Registrazione
    Aug 2017
    Località
    San Diego
    Messaggi
    7.131

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    up per gilgamesh

  7. #27
    Senior Member L'avatar di Gilgamesh
    Data Registrazione
    Jan 2016
    Messaggi
    17.915

    Re: Moloch, lo hai letto Blindsight?

    grazie, ho scoperto che esiste il seguito di blindsight

Permessi di Scrittura

  • Tu non puoi inviare nuove discussioni
  • Tu non puoi inviare risposte
  • Tu non puoi inviare allegati
  • Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
  •  
Chi Siamo
Forum ufficiale della rivista
The Games Machine
Seguici su