Il caso che ti ho linkato ERA emergenza terroristica ed Apple HA rifiutato. Qui ci sono tutti i riferimenti legali oltre che i passaggi di quell'evento https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI–Ap...yption_disputeOriginariamente Scritto da Galf
Apple's opposition to the order[edit]
The February 16, 2016 order issued by Magistrate Judge Pym gave Apple five days to apply for relief if Apple believed the order was "unreasonably burdensome". Apple announced its intent to oppose the order, citing the security risks that the creation of a backdoor would pose towards customers.[28] It also stated that no government had ever asked for similar access.[29] The company was given until February 26 to fully respond to the court order.[30][31]
On the same day the order was issued, chief executive officer Tim Cook released an online statement to Apple customers, explaining the company's motives for opposing the court order. He also stated that while they respect the FBI, the request they made threatens data security by establishing a precedent that the U.S. government could use to force any technology company to create software that could undermine the security of its products.[32] He said in part:
The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.[32]
In response to the opposition, on February 19, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a new application urging a federal judge to compel Apple to comply with the order.[33] The new application stated that the company could install the software on the phone in its own premises, and after the FBI had hacked the phone via remote connection, Apple could remove and destroy the software.[34] Apple hired attorneys Ted Olson and Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. to fight the order on appeal.[24]
The same day, Apple revealed that it had discussed with the FBI four methods to access data in the iPhone in early January, but, as was revealed by a footnote in the February 19 application to the court, one of the more promising methods was ruled out by a mistake during the investigation of the attack. After the shooter's phone had been recovered, the FBI asked San Bernardino County, the owner of the phone, to reset the password to the shooter's iCloud account in order to acquire data from the iCloud backup. However, this rendered the phone unable to back up recent data to iCloud unless its pass-code is entered.[35][36][37] This was confirmed by the U.S. Department of Justice, which then added that any backup would have been "insufficient" because they would not have been able to recover enough information from it.[38]
Poi libero di pensarla come ti pare, io me ne batto il cazzo anche se dovesse venire fuori che Apple fa parte del NWO assieme all'FBI
Ah non dimenticarti il cappello:
Rispondi Citando