Crisi in Medio Oriente e Nord Africa.

[Jaqen]

Io non capisco se questi ci credono davvero o sono degli imbecilli, oppure sono in malefede.

Propenderei per la malafede, nonostante il cognome stoltenberg sia tutto un programma

- - - Aggiornato - - -

Minchia che trollata epica

Approved

- - - Aggiornato - - -

I comportamenti attuali delle nostre classi dirigenti sono dettati non solo dalla mediocrità generale, ma anche dal fatto che loro hanno una percezione della realtà diversa dalla nostra.
Nessuno di loro è mai morto per i terroristi islamici. Nessuno di loro è costretto a vivere nelle periferie disagiate in mezzo a migliaia di immigrati. Nessuno di loro (a parte rari casi) è finito in mezzo alla strada per la crisi economica. I nostri problemi loro li vedono lontani, leggendoli sulla carta o vedendoli in Tv.

Ben detto.
C'è un mix di ideologia, odio dell'occidente, convenienza (vera o percepita), malafede, cecità e sopratutto indifferenza.

A tal proposito, anche se andrebbe meglio forse nell'altro topic (che però non ho il coraggio e la voglia di aprire, abbiate pazienza), riporto una intervista abbastanza fatta ad un funzionario svedese da parte del gatestone. Enfasi mia.

Sofia Häggmark, a non-partisan official at the Department of Justice unit for migration rights. Here is the Q & A:

Q: Should everyone get to seek asylum in Sweden, even if it leads to Sweden's undoing?
A: "The right of asylum is very strong. We have international rules and EU rules that say that if a person comes to an EU country, that person has a right to seek asylum."

Q: Is it all right to say no if there are groups in your country that are being threatened by the asylum seekers -- minority populations such as Roma, Jews and Sami [Lapp]? Or that Sweden cannot afford it?
A: "No, if a person has grounds for asylum or risks the death penalty or torture in their home country, you cannot deny them asylum."

Q: Is it not the Swedish government's primary task to protect Sweden and the Swedish people?
A: "We need to abide by international rules; we are obliged to do that. We can be dragged before the Court of Justice of the European Union if we do not allow people to seek asylum."

Q: Which is more important – Swedish lives, or the risk that you might end up before the Court of Justice of the European Union?
A: "I cannot answer that question; I can only tell you what the rules are."

Q: So you are saying that if 30 million people come here to kill us, we have no defense, we cannot stop it?
A: "I can only tell you that the right of asylum gives very strong protection."

Q: But not for the Swedes?
A: "If a person kills someone here in Sweden, the criminal justice system handles that and tries them. We need to look at every individual asylum case."

Q: Do you think it has ever happened at any time in the history of the world that a country cared more for the citizens of other countries than its own?
A: "I cannot answer that. But there is no rule that sets a limit for how many [asylum seekers] Sweden can accept."

Q: So there is no plan for what to do when the country is full and the citizens are scared?
A: "No, there is not."

Q: Do you personally think that feels okay?
A: "I cannot answer that. That is not my job."

Q: If several millions of Muslims come here and implement Sharia law, then the right of asylum has effectively contributed to abolishing the democracy in our country, replacing the Swedish people and annihilating the whole concept of Sweden. Have none of you pondered these fateful issues?
A: "I understand your thoughts."