AMD R7 5800X 8C/16T, Noctua NH-D15, Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE, 16GB DDR4 3600MT/s CL16, AMD Rx 6800, ASUS XG32UQ + LG 32UL750
SSDs M2: Samsung 960EVO 500GB, Solidigm P41+ 2TB | Windows 11 Pro
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12520...xy-s9-review/8The Exynos 9810 Galaxy S9 absolutely fell flat on its face in this test and posted the worst results among our tracking of the latest generation devices, lasting 3 hours less than the Exynos 8895 Galaxy S8. This was such a terrible run that I redid the test and still resulted in the same runtime.
I investigated the matter further to try to see if this was caused by the high energy usage of the M3 cores – and it seems it is. Enabling the “CPU limiter” (S9 PS result in the graphs) which is found in the battery optimisation options of Samsung’s firmware greatly throttles the M3 cores down to 1469 MHz, memory controller to half speed and also seemingly changes some scheduler settings to make them more conservative. This results in peak performance equal to the Exynos 8895- however the scheduler alterations also noticeably slow down UI responsiveness so it’s actually a worse experience. Nevertheless, backing off on performance results in regaining almost 3 hours.
NB: Snapdragon su 9+ vs Exynos su 9 liscio, che ha 16% in meno di batteria ma pure uno schermo più piccolo.
Comunque in fondo Exynos "stock", a metà classifica "PS" se limita la velocità del SoC... ma le performance ne risentono.
Sostanzialmente pessimo.
Anche con 16% in meno di batteria non può durare solo poco più della metà.
Cioè... è come se avesse una batterai solo da 2000MAh.While the performance advantage of the Snapdragon 845 variant over the Exynos 9810 variant is something we could live with, the battery life results of the Exynos is definitely a deal-breaker.
Ultima modifica di GeeGeeOH; 14-05-21 alle 10:02
AMD R7 5800X 8C/16T, Noctua NH-D15, Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE, 16GB DDR4 3600MT/s CL16, AMD Rx 6800, ASUS XG32UQ + LG 32UL750
SSDs M2: Samsung 960EVO 500GB, Solidigm P41+ 2TB | Windows 11 Pro
Migliorato molto.
Credo che con l'S9 avessero toccato il fondo.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15603...nia-devices/11
Review del S20 non FE, ma i SoC son gli stessi.
Ultima modifica di GeeGeeOH; 14-05-21 alle 11:33
AMD R7 5800X 8C/16T, Noctua NH-D15, Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE, 16GB DDR4 3600MT/s CL16, AMD Rx 6800, ASUS XG32UQ + LG 32UL750
SSDs M2: Samsung 960EVO 500GB, Solidigm P41+ 2TB | Windows 11 Pro
Tipo 13:30 contro 14 ore, nel test?
Di certo la differenza non vale 100 euro, diciamo che fino a 50 forse... vediamo a quanto li mettono la prossima volta che tornano disponibili direttamente su Amazon, che attualmente non lo sono
Esistono smartphone con autonomia significativamente migliore, per curiosità?
DK
Tipo questo samsung
https://amzn.to/2RTOBGu
Ultima modifica di GeeGeeOH; 14-05-21 alle 15:23
AMD R7 5800X 8C/16T, Noctua NH-D15, Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE, 16GB DDR4 3600MT/s CL16, AMD Rx 6800, ASUS XG32UQ + LG 32UL750
SSDs M2: Samsung 960EVO 500GB, Solidigm P41+ 2TB | Windows 11 Pro
AMD R7 5800X 8C/16T, Noctua NH-D15, Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE, 16GB DDR4 3600MT/s CL16, AMD Rx 6800, ASUS XG32UQ + LG 32UL750
SSDs M2: Samsung 960EVO 500GB, Solidigm P41+ 2TB | Windows 11 Pro
ASUS ha giusto annunciato lo ZenFone 8.
148 x 68.5 x 8.9 mm
5.9" 1080x2400
Snapdragon 888
4000 mAh
AMD R7 5800X 8C/16T, Noctua NH-D15, Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE, 16GB DDR4 3600MT/s CL16, AMD Rx 6800, ASUS XG32UQ + LG 32UL750
SSDs M2: Samsung 960EVO 500GB, Solidigm P41+ 2TB | Windows 11 Pro
Batteria meh