ROTFL, "Reddit: il notiziario" :asd:
Visualizzazione Stampabile
This make me angry,i only wish that this war stop for god sake. What is the point of all this shit? i see one cruise missile landing on a girl ridding his bike, an old man going back to home in his bike too, being hit by a russian armored vehicle .50 gun. But im only understand that the only way to stop this war is winning against Russia. Ukraine and his defenders are making his stand against the odds, and only make my proud of a country that never hear before.
*Slava Ukraine*
Frame by frame Slowmo of the Russian who shot at Ukrainian forces during a fake surrender in which he got the rest of his unit KIA - Gun clearly visible in this clipSoldiers, Militia & Volunteers (v.redd.it)
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarV...n_who_shot_at/
Bel colpo! Presi in pieno!
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFoota...iterated_by_a/
La mobilitaZione procede benissimo
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarV...nd_out_theyre/
i soldati russi in questa guerra sono carne da cannone per antonomasia, il loro unico scopo e fare da bersagli in modo da far consumare al nemico quante più munizioni possibili :bua:
https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mon...cb3453232.html
Questo credo sia abbastanza scontato.
Purtroppo questa è una guerra che Mosca non terminerà mai se non annientando ogni forma di resistenza in Ucraina e conquistando tutto il territorio. L'unica alternativa (forse) è arrivare ad un "cessate il fuoco" il prima possibile e sbrigare nell'arco di 20 minuti le pratiche per far entrare l'Ucraina nella NATO. Oppure una bella rivolta dall'interno che mette Mosca e San Pietroburgo a ferro e fuoco per qualche anno.
Ormai Mosca ha messo troppo in ballo in questa guerra ed ha perso troppo per fermarsi. Devono dimostrare di essere una potenza in grado di conquistare ancora oggi, a qualsiasi costo.
Credo che il peccato originale lo abbia fatto l'occidente lo scorso anno mentre Putin ammassava indisturbato truppe al confine. Da subito gli avremmo dovuto far capire, riempendo l'Ucraina di ogni tipo di armamento possibile immaginabile, che quella sarebbe stata la sua tomba.
BigD, quanti minuti mancano a mezzanotte?
It’s Costing Peanuts for the US to Defeat Russia
The cost-benefit analysis of US support for Ukraine is incontrovertible. It’s producing wins at almost every level.
Former President Trump, and others in the US including some Democrats as well as Republicans, have criticized continued US support for Ukraine in its war with Russia. They have called for military and financial support to Ukraine to be cut, even ended. They downplay the risk from Russia and argue that the money should be spent at home.
Yet from numerous perspectives, when viewed from a bang-per-buck perspective, US and Western support for Ukraine is an incredibly cost-effective investment.
Altogether, the Biden administration received Congressional approval for $40bn in aid for Ukraine for 2022 and has requested an additional $37.7bn for 2022. More than half of this aid has been earmarked for defense.
These sums pale into insignificance when set against a total US defense budget of $715bn for 2022. The assistance represents 5.6% of total US defense spending. But Russia is a primary adversary of the US, a top tier rival not too far behind China, its number one strategic challenger. In cold, geopolitical terms, this war provides a prime opportunity for the US to erode and degrade Russia’s conventional defense capability, with no boots on the ground and little risk to US lives.
The Ukrainian armed forces have already killed or wounded upwards of 100,000 Russian troops, half its original fighting force; there have been almost 8,000 confirmed losses of armored vehicles including thousands of tanks, thousands of APCs, artillery pieces, hundreds of fixed and rotary wing aircraft, and numerous naval vessels. US spending of 5.6% of its defense budget to destroy nearly half of Russia’s conventional military capability seems like an absolutely incredible investment. If we divide out the US defense budget to the threats it faces, Russia would perhaps be of the order of $100bn-150bn in spend-to-threat. So spending just $40bn a year, erodes a threat value of $100-150bn, a two-to-three time return.
The US military might reasonably wish Russia to continue deploying military forces for Ukraine to destroy.
Meanwhile, replacing destroyed kit, and keeping up with the new arms race that it has now triggered with the West will surely end up bankrupting the Russian economy; especially an economy subject to aggressive Western sanctions. How can Russia possibly hope to win an arms race when the combined GDP of the West is $40 trillion, and its defense spending amounting to 2% of GDP totals well in excess of $1 trillion when the disproportionate US defense contribution is considered? Russia’s total GDP is only $1.8 trillion. Vladimir Putin will have to divert spending from consumption to defense, risking social and political unrest over the medium term, and a real and soon-to-be present danger to his regime. Just imagine how much more of a bargain Western military aid will be if it ultimately brings positive regime change in Russia.
Second, the war has served to destroy the myth that Russian military technology is somehow comparable to that of the US and West. Remember that Ukraine is using only upgraded second generation US technology but is consistently beating whatever Russia’s military can deploy. Wars are shop windows for defense manufacturers; any buyer in their right mind will want the technology made by the winner. Putin’s misjudgment has merely provided a fantastic marketing opportunity for its Western competitors.
Note also that the war is also pushing NATO partners to quickly increase spending to the 2% of GDP and above target. Given the US’ technological advantage in defense equipment, a sizeable share of this additional military outlay will be spent on US equipment.
una signora pacifista su twitter mi risponde ad insulti, non capisco :piange:
sì, però tutti gli altri erano sdraiati a terra e non costituivano più alcun pericolo (almeno per quello che si vede lì, il filmato intero non l'ho visto). poi magari si chiuderà un occhio perché la guerra fa schifo, l'adrenalina del momento, servono uomini, i russi fanno ben di peggio, ecc..., ma ucciderere anche quelli stesi a terra, ammesso che siano rimasti lì e non si siano messi a correre, imho è stata praticamente una esecuzione. fingere una resa per poi colpire è altra cosa, lì è solo uno svitato che ha fatto ammazzare tutti.
Se uno dei cosiddetti "prigionieri" comincia a sparare all'impazzata, la tua reazione è quella di pensare "cazzo, è una trappola!" e cercare di salvarti la pelle. Fai presto a parlare tu, dal tuo divano.
Ma c'era anche la possibilità di soffiare su un fuoco che non era ancora divampato.
Io ero e resto dell'idea che le sanzioni economiche, unica cosa insindacabile da chiunque a mio avviso, dovevano partite in maniera più concreta prima, pur consci che avremmo pagato lo scotto che comunque paghiamo ora.
Forse sarebbe stato il miglior deterrente. Ovviamente i ma e i se vanno bene solo finché ne parliamo tra noi e qui
L'occidente probabilmente non si aspettava una follia tale da parte di Pootin.. credeva nella solita provocazione :uhm:
io non ci penserei due volte a commettere crimini di guerra se facessero fuori mi' madre/sorella/nonna/cugino etc.