Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email
licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at
https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/0157d5f9-...e-f0a77da59b5d
US to cut some security funds for European countries bordering Russia
Move comes as Washington pushes Nato allies to pay more towards their own defence
A soldier wearing a camouflage uniform and helmet runs past an armoured vehicle and smoke during a military exercise in Estonia.
The future of the Baltic Security Initiative, a separate programme created to boost the armed forces of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, is also under threat © Raigo Pajula/AFP/Getty Images
US to cut some security funds for European countries bordering Russia on x (opens in a new window)
US to cut some security funds for European countries bordering Russia on facebook (opens in a new window)
US to cut some security funds for European countries bordering Russia on linkedin (opens in a new window)
current progress 0%
Amy Mackinnon, Steff Chávez, Abigail Hauslohner and Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington and Henry Foy in Paris
Publishedyesterday
386
Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free
Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world
The US is to phase out security assistance programmes for European armies along Russia’s border, as it pushes the continent to pay for more of its own defence.
Pentagon officials last week informed European diplomats that the US would no longer fund programmes that train and equip militaries in eastern European countries that would be on the frontline of any conflict with Russia, people familiar with the matter said.
Spending for the Pentagon programme, which falls under an authority known as section 333, must be agreed by the US Congress, but the Trump administration has not requested more money. Funds already approved will be available until the end of September 2026.
A White House official said the move aligned with President Donald Trump’s efforts to “re-evaluate and realign” foreign aid, and corresponded with an executive order he issued on his first day in office.
“This action has been co-ordinated with European countries in line with the executive order and the president’s long-standing emphasis on ensuring Europe takes more responsibility for its own defence,” the official said.
Under pressure from Trump, US Nato allies in June agreed to increase their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
Winding down the section 333 funding would affect a programme with a worldwide budget of more than $1bn, according to estimates from Senate aides, potentially cutting hundreds of millions of dollars the US sends to the Russian border countries. The Pentagon has not informed lawmakers of the exact amount that will be phased out.
The programme allocated $1.6bn in Europe between 2018-2022, roughly 29 per cent of the global 333 spending, according to the US Government Accountability Office. Key recipients include Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
Officials from dozens of European embassies in Washington, including from countries that do not receive the assistance, attended a meeting where Pentagon officials told them about the cuts.
The move appeared intended to encourage wealthier European countries to pay for more of the frontline states’ security assistance, one European official said.
European governments were startled by the communication and are trying to get further details from Washington, according to two diplomats briefed on the discussions.
European officials are also trying to understand whether domestic funding can fill the gaps, or whether the cuts will have an impact on critical elements of European security.
“If they are being brutal then it will have big implications,” said one of the diplomats, adding that Nato would definitely be affected as some of the funding was routed through the alliance.
“It’s causing a lot of concern and uncertainty,” said the second diplomat, comparing it with Trump’s earlier decision to slash US international aid.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate’s foreign relations committee, described the cuts as a “misguided move that sends exactly the wrong signal as we try to force Putin to the negotiating table and deter Russian aggression”.
The US’s separate Foreign Military Financing programme, which provides funding to countries to buy big-ticket items such as fighter jets, ships and tanks, is not affected by the most recent decision, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The cuts also come as Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby seeks to shift US defence resources to the Indo-Pacific to boost deterrence and reduce the odds of a conflict with China over Taiwan.
Earlier this year, Washington abruptly halted shipments of munitions and several high-value weapons intended for Ukraine after Colby initiated a review that raised concerns about the US’s own stockpiles. Trump later ordered that the deliveries be resumed.
Recommended
Minna Ålander
Spending 5 per cent on defence doesn’t make Nato stronger
Soldiers of Estonian Defense Forces guarding the border crossing point of Narva
The future of the Baltic Security Initiative, a separate programme created in 2020 to boost the armed forces of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, is also under threat. Last year, Congress approved $228mn to support the initiative.
The White House has not sought further funding for the programme in next year’s budget. A person familiar with the matter said the programme was being re-evaluated by the administration.
The loss of US security assistance would be “very tough” for the Baltic states, said retired US admiral Mark Montgomery, now a senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies think-tank. “The whole idea here is making them capable of defending themselves.”
All three states share land borders with Russia, and the region has been subject to attacks attributed to Moscow, including on critical infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, cyber attacks and sabotage.
The administration is carrying out a review of its troop deployments worldwide and has said it intends to reduce its presence in Europe.
Trump met Poland’s President Karol Nawrocki at the White House on Wednesday and said he had no plans to withdraw troops from the country.
The US has about 10,000 personnel stationed in Poland on a rotational basis and Trump said he was “very happy” with the arrangement. “We’ll put more there if they want,” he added.
This article has been amended to reflect that Congress approved $228mn in funding for the Baltic Security Initiative, not $288mn
Originariamente Scritto da Yuki
Scusa Kemper, ma le genAi sono fondamentalmente ancorate ad essere generatori predittivi. È così che funziona il core delle ia generative e così continuerà ad essere, per quante migliorie potranno metterci. Per questo gli esperti di AI che lavorano seriamente all' AGI (non openAI né nessun altra simile quindi) sono concordi nel dire che questi strumenti sono su un binario morto. Per intenderci, tu ti fidi ciecamente di questo?
Permessi di Scrittura
Rispondi Citando
